Powered by OPF
OPF WIKI STATIC ARCHIVE
2,681 pages · 153 spaces · 776 tags · 4,025 history records · 96.2% of the original wiki recovered
Archived copy. This page was recovered from the Internet Archive snapshot of /display/SP/SB-CaseStudy with TUW taken on 2016-03-31. The original wiki at wiki.opf-labs.org is being decommissioned.

SB-CaseStudy with TUW

Added by Bjarne Andersen · last edited by Bjarne Andersen · on Nov 06, 2012 (view change)
Task
Responsible
Status
Send preliminary readings to SB
TUW
Done
Send capability questionnaire to SB
TUW
Done
Fill out questionnaire at SB
SB
6/11
Read the 3 proposed articles
all participants
before 14/11
Generate FITS-data of mp3-files
SB
In progress
Generate FITS-data of other sample data
SB
In progress
Send FITS-output to TUW
SB
9/11
Activity breakdown and effort estimate by SB
  • analyze collection
  • characterise collection
  • assess collection (e.g. format)
  • document collection and choices made (plan)
  • manual QA
  • development of QA-tool
SB
6/11

0. preliminary reading

ijdl2009.pdf

four2011.pdf

bsb.pdf

1. baseline capability assessment of SB  

    - start separate
    - beginning of workshop: reconcile

IT-CMF PP Questions.xlsx

IT-CMF PO Questions.xlsx

IT-CMF PCM Questions.xlsx

IT-CMF PM Questions.xlsx

2. baseline collection profile

    - based on ffmpeg  
    - random sample selection for QA (~80 files)
    - how much effort is/was involved??

Workshop 14-16. November:

Hannes and Kresimir will join from TUW

# finish capability assessment
# tutorial (1-day +)
# create plan with plato 3
    . manual sample selection
    . requirements specification
    . manual QA
    . decision
    . plan specification
# create/revise policy model to cover scenario and sig props of audio content

Outline agenda

14. november: assessment and tutorial
15. november: tutorial and plan
16. november: plan and control policy model

then:

. TUW creates c3po profile
. analyse content profile created with c3po
.... in December: create plan with plato 4
    - automated content profile
    - control policy >> requirements tree
    - Taverna workflow discovery on myExperiment, invocation, returning results
    - control policy >> utility functions
    - construction of plan spec
    - automated deployment of plan into repository (RODA?)
    ... COMPARISON of effort, automation, organisational maturity
        . for content profiling
        . for sample selection
        . for requirements specification
        . for experimentation
    ... re-assessment of capabilities in SB!
 
##    document carefully ALL efforts involved of all people directly or indirectly involved
>> SCAPE report to be delivered in January (i.e. needs to be delivered before Christmas)

afterwards:

TUW (and/or SB) creates c3po profile, discuss together
TUW simulate plato4 planning > estimate effort
TUW/KEEPS/SB prepare demo for plato-roda deployment (subset of the collectoin)
    (dependent on myExperiment/Taverna features)
SB+TUW create plan again in plato4 (maybe even early Dec in Portugal?)
Capabiliy re-assessment
>> before Christmas