Archived copy.
This page was recovered from the Internet Archive snapshot of
/display/SPR/Deposited Personal Collection Stakeholder Analysis taken on 2016-08-04.
The original wiki at wiki.opf-labs.org is being decommissioned.
Deposited Personal Collection Stakeholder Analysis
| Stakeholder | Interest/stake |
|---|---|
| Director | International and home reputation as a first rate university Increased reputation as a research institution Institutional brand Potential to attract external funding from research and other funders Guidance to manage his/her own archive Will deposit archive with institution in the future |
| Director of Administration |
Financial Institutional reputation Legal compliance e.g. FOI/DPA Potential to attract external funding Potential to apply learning outcomes to institutional records to improve efficiency Managing records electronically saves space |
| Head of Library Services |
Financial External reputation of the library Collection development Potential to attract funding from professional funders e.g. JISC Reputation amongst academic library community Potential to attract high quality staff Staff development |
| Professors | Research potential for students and themselves Potential for funding opportunities International reputation Future interest in depositing their collections with the archives Improved reputation with external organisations interested in depositing collections with the archives Potential to attract students to the institution, especially overseas students Guidance on how to manage their own archive |
| Lecturers | Research potential for students and themselves |
| Head of IT Services |
Financial – space saving on internal servers by hosting data externally. Collaboration strategic priority for IT Potential to apply learning outcomes to institutional records to save space |
| IT Administrators |
Staff Development |
| External Professional Community |
Potential Collaboration Potential to learn from shared experience |
| External hosting organisation (ULCC) |
Financial Increased reputation in local academic / professional community Product development |
| External Academics |
Research potential Potential to deposit collections with the institution Potential to work at the institution |
| External organisations / individuals |
Potential to deposit collections |
| Head of Estates |
Managing records electronically saves physical space |
| Marketing & Alumni |
Brand of the institutionImproved reputation of institution |
| Students |
Research potential |
Now enter your stakeholders in the table below
| Significant Influence |
Some Influence |
Little Influence |
No Influence |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significant Importance |
Director Director of Admin Professors Head of Library Services |
External hosting organisationStudents | ||
| Some Importance |
Director of IT Lecturers | External professionals | ||
| Little Importance |
IT Administrators |
External academics External organisations / individuals Marketing & Alumni |
||
| No Importance |
Head of Estates |
Stakeholder management approach - how you need to interact with them
| Interest (low) | Interest (high) | |
| Power (high) | Keep Satisfied Director of Administration |
Manage Closely Director Professors Head of Library ServicesExternal hosting organisation |
| Power (low) | Monitor (Minimum effort) Director of IT Lecturers IT Administrators External academicsHead of Estates Students |
Keep Informed External professionals External organisations & individuals |