Archived copy.
This page was recovered from the Internet Archive snapshot of
/display/SPR/HRP - Stakeholders taken on 2013-07-27.
The original wiki at wiki.opf-labs.org is being decommissioned.
HRP - Stakeholders
JISC's explanation of stakeholder analysis: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/fundingopportunities/projectmanagement/planning/stakeholders.aspx![]()
| List of potential stakeholders* |
|---|
| Head of finance |
| IT directors / managers |
| Heads of department |
| Researchers (professors, fellows, PhDs) |
| Project officers or departmental managers |
| Lecturers |
| Library directors / senior managers |
| Library managers / team leaders |
| Subject librarians |
| Acquisitions / cataloguing |
| Information literacy trainers |
| Archivists |
List your stakeholders in the table below
The list above should give you a starting point, but note that this is not an exhaustive list - think about stakeholders at your institution
| Stakeholder | Interest/stake |
|---|---|
| Trustees | StakePrestige Reputation Responsibility - to ensure HRP fulfils its mandateLegacy – to ensure a legacy is maintained |
| Head of IS | Stake/InterestResponsible for IS support an infrastructure Efficient management of digital assets across the organisation. Responsible for ensuring the above enables HRP to meet its objectiveSpecifically Interested in: improving access to data; reducing costs of data storage; in the ability to reuse data; in developing specific expertise and skills in house that match the organisations technical requirements |
| Directors (General) | Stake/InterestStake in fulfilling the organisation’s strategyResponsibility and reputation |
| Collections Management Board (C+L) | Stake/Interest Supporting the collections management function and re-accreditation – greater access to information, preserving information about the collection. |
| Heads of Departments (C+L) | Interested in improving access to information; interested in competing on a national and international scale in terms of our offer to the general public; interested in research and academic studies; interested in preserving their work |
| Internal Users (Staff) | Better access to digital assets – enabling wider use and reuseReducing time/resources spent – e.g. on finding information, creating/recreating information Improving workflowsImproved output |
| Business Side | InterestDP would give better access to what can be a commercial asset – digital asset can become a revenue creator. |
| External Users | Better access to digital assets – increased and diverse access. E.g. online exhibitions, website offerings, research service |
Now enter your stakeholders in the table below
| Significant Influence |
Some Influence |
Little Influence |
No Influence |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significant Importance |
Trustees; Directors | |||
| Some Importance |
Heads of Department; Head of IS | |||
| Little Importance |
||||
| No Importance |
Stakeholder management approach - how you need to interact with them
| Interest (low) | Interest (high) | |
| Power (high) | Keep Satisfied ... |
Manage Closely ... |
| Power (low) | Monitor (Minimum effort) ... |
Keep Informed ... |